Cap and closure
Missing, proud, skewed or incorrect caps; tamper-band presence; closure colour and orientation.
Rigid-container inspection and removal
Remove the exact failed container after cap, label, date-code, barcode, fill-level, leak or weight inspection—without upsetting adjacent good products.
A guided pusher, sweep arm or lane diverter is normally the starting point for stable rigid containers. The correct choice depends on container height, weight, centre of gravity, line speed, gap and whether the pack can tolerate side contact.
Light or empty containers need particular care because a reject action can disturb neighbouring products. We prove the complete sequence with representative samples and realistic line conditions.
Missing, proud, skewed or incorrect caps; tamper-band presence; closure colour and orientation.
Label presence and position, artwork match, barcode readability, date and batch-code verification.
Underfill, overfill, missing components and gross-weight checks from sensors or checkweighers.
Damage, deformation, contamination, neck faults and other visible defects detected by cameras.
Pressure decay, vacuum, squeeze, high-voltage or vision-based seal inspection results.
Wrong-SKU, no-read or mismatched 1D, 2D, QR and Data Matrix codes tracked to rejection.
Maintain a reliable product window so one failure does not become a multiple reject.
Follow the failed container from the inspection point to the reject position.
Apply the correct force and motion for the pack geometry and speed.
Independently confirm that the expected container entered the reject area.
Use a guarded or lockable reject route where product control requires it.
Send the smallest and largest container, empty and filled weight, line speed, minimum gap, conveyor width and height, current inspection equipment, reject-side space and a short production video. Include the least stable format and any wet, dusty or washdown conditions.
The system can be designed with a new conveyor or integrated into an existing customer conveyor. Retrofit feasibility depends on mechanical condition, available length, drive control, signal access, guarding and responsibility for the existing machine.
Final performance is confirmed against the actual product range and production conditions.
We control spacing and guides, shape the contact face and prove pusher speed, stroke and return timing across the operating range.
Yes, subject to a risk review and trials. A controlled pusher or guided diversion is generally preferred over an uncontrolled drop.
Potentially. Separate reject lanes or bins can be used where inspection results and available space support fault segregation.
The system can alarm and stop the line, preserving the fault until an authorised operator follows the agreed recovery procedure.
Start with your product and line
Send us your line speed, product dimensions, inspection equipment and a short production video. We will help define the right reject method and controls.
Share the product, throughput, inspection trigger and available conveyor space. We’ll help identify a practical next step.
Request a line review →01865 416657